Переключиться на Русский
Home · What is this website about? · How do I upload a protocol? · Facebook
Voting location #
City of St. Petersburg → ...
 
Комментарий: Замена голосов практически на всех участках по идентичной схеме
Kabardino-Balkaria → ...
 
Комментарий: Аномальные результаты в одном из районов Кабардино-Балкарии - расхождения между участками отсутствуют, что не происходит ни в одном другом регионе. Доказательство того, что результаты по Кавказу были вбиты ЦИКом вручную.
Republic of North Ossetia - Alania → ...
 
Комментарий: На этом сводном графике избирательных участков одного из районов Владикавказа видно, что результаты были вбиты ЦИКом вручную, допущены грубейшие опечатки. Доказательство того, что итоговая результативность на Кавказе никак не связана с голосами избирателей.
The Republic of Komi → ...
 
Комментарий: Замена голосов практически на всех участках по идентичной схеме
Nizhny Novgorod region → ...
 
Комментарий: Замена голосов практически на всех участках по идентичной схеме
Samara Region → ...
 
Комментарий: Замена голосов на отдельных участках
Rostov Region → ...
 
Комментарий:
Moscow region → ...
 
Комментарий:
What can I do?
 
—Please tell the world.
 
A Just Russia
LDPR
Patriots
CPRF
Yabloko
United Russia
Right Cause
*Nizhny Novgorod region
218 facts of summary data falsification
14.1%1
10.6%3
12.1%1
10.7%3
1.1%1
0.9%3
34.3%1
28.8%3
4.6%1
2.8%3
31.5%1
+16.4%2
+2.57%5
44.6%3
0.7%1
0.5%3
*City of St. Petersburg
95 facts of summary data falsification
28.6%1
23.7%3
10.9%1
10.3%3
1.3%1
1.2%3
16.9%1
15.3%3
13.4%1
11.6%3
25.7%1
+13.3%2
+1.17%5
35.4%3
0.9%1
0.9%3
*The City of Moscow
48 facts of summary data falsification
15.6%1
12.1%3
11.3%1
9.4%3
1.7%1
1.3%3
23.1%1
19.4%3
12.7%1
8.6%3
32.4%1
+8.0%2
+0.28%5
46.6%3
0.9%1
0.8%3
*Krasnodar region
38 facts of summary data falsification
13.7%1
10.8%3
13.8%1
10.5%3
1.5%1
0.9%3
19.7%1
17.6%3
5.5%1
2.0%3
43.3%1
+15.6%2
+0.29%5
56.2%3
0.8%1
0.5%3
*Moscow region
37 facts of summary data falsification
16.7%1
15.9%3
14.2%1
14.3%3
1.5%1
1.3%3
26.8%1
25.5%3
7.6%1
6.1%3
29.5%1
+12.8%2
+0.27%5
32.8%3
1.1%1
1.0%3
*Rostov Region
37 facts of summary data falsification
16.1%1
13.3%3
12.7%1
10.2%3
0.9%1
0.8%3
25.8%1
20.8%3
3.0%1
2.9%3
39.8%1
+16.0%2
+0.34%5
50.2%3
0.5%1
0.5%3
*Samara Region
36 facts of summary data falsification
14.3%1
14.2%3
19.1%1
15.7%3
1.4%1
1.2%3
28.4%1
23.1%3
4.2%1
4.0%3
29.6%1
+31.1%2
+0.94%5
39.4%3
0.7%1
0.5%3
*Kostroma region
26 facts of summary data falsification
17.7%1
18.6%3
14.1%1
16.0%3
0.6%1
1.0%3
27.6%1
28.8%3
1.7%1
3.0%3
36.4%1
+13.9%2
+0.52%5
30.7%3
0.4%1
0.5%3
*Republic of Tyva
22 facts of summary data falsification
10.1%1
6.7%3
5.7%1
2.1%3
0.5%1
0.3%3
7.6%1
3.9%3
1.2%1
0.5%3
74.1%1
+10.1%2
+1.90%5
85.3%3
0.4%1
0.2%3
*The Republic of Komi
22 facts of summary data falsification
13.3%1
11.5%3
16.3%1
11.9%3
2.0%1
0.9%3
19.1%1
13.5%3
4.6%1
1.5%3
41.4%1
+23.6%2
+1.20%5
58.8%3
1.1%1
0.6%3
*Saratov Region
14 facts of summary data falsification
12.4%1
10.1%3
8.6%1
7.2%3
1.0%1
0.6%3
17.1%1
13.8%3
4.4%1
1.7%3
53.8%1
+16.2%2
+0.22%5
64.9%3
0.4%1
0.3%3
*Tyumen Region
13 facts of summary data falsification
10.8%1
7.4%3
18.9%1
14.1%3
1.0%1
0.8%3
15.2%1
11.7%3
2.9%1
2.0%3
49.4%1
+11.4%2
+0.34%5
62.2%3
0.6%1
0.6%3
*Penza Region
12 facts of summary data falsification
13.0%1
8.7%3
13.1%1
10.1%3
1.2%1
0.7%3
26.5%1
19.8%3
5.5%1
2.1%3
38.3%1
+18.3%2
+0.39%5
56.3%3
0.7%1
0.4%3
*Stavropol Territory
7 facts of summary data falsification
10.1%1
11.8%3
17.5%1
15.3%3
1.5%1
0.9%3
18.8%1
18.4%3
4.5%1
2.1%3
45.6%1
+7.5%2
+0.07%5
49.1%3
0.7%1
0.4%3
*Chelyabinsk region
7 facts of summary data falsification
18.5%1
16.6%3
15.3%1
11.8%3
1.1%1
1.0%3
17.9%1
14.6%3
3.8%1
3.5%3
41.3%1
+27.1%2
+0.17%5
50.3%3
0.7%1
0.6%3
*The Republic of Khakassia
5 facts of summary data falsification
16.7%1
13.7%3
18.4%1
16.0%3
1.1%1
1.6%3
24.1%1
23.6%3
1.8%1
2.7%3
34.9%1
+20.0%2
+0.46%5
40.1%3
0.5%1
0.6%3
*The Volgograd Region
4 facts of summary data falsification
22.8%1
21.9%3
15.4%1
13.3%3
1.6%1
1.1%3
26.4%1
22.8%3
6.4%1
3.4%3
24.2%1
+13.0%2
+0.09%5
35.5%3
0.8%1
0.6%3
*The Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan)
3 facts of summary data falsification
8.8%1
5.3%3
5.7%1
3.5%3
0.4%1
0.4%3
19.7%1
10.6%3
3.2%1
1.1%3
59.5%1
+10.3%2
+0.02%5
77.8%3
0.6%1
0.4%3
*Republic of Bashkortostan
2 facts of summary data falsification
8.0%1
5.5%3
5.8%1
5.2%3
0.9%1
0.5%3
18.9%1
15.6%3
3.1%1
1.2%3
60.8%1
+5.6%2
+0.02%5
70.5%3
0.5%1
0.4%3
*Ivanovo region
2 facts of summary data falsification
16.5%1
15.6%3
14.6%1
14.8%3
1.4%1
1.2%3
28.6%1
22.5%3
6.7%1
3.5%3
31.0%1
+3.1%2
+0.04%5
40.1%3
1.3%1
0.8%3
*Novgorod region
2 facts of summary data falsification
30.8%1
28.1%3
8.8%1
11.5%3
1.0%1
0.9%3
23.4%1
19.5%3
5.7%1
3.1%3
28.2%1
+14.4%2
+0.32%5
34.6%3
0.5%1
0.5%3
*Irkutsk Region
2 facts of summary data falsification
14.3%1
13.4%3
19.2%1
17.3%3
1.1%1
1.2%3
27.4%1
27.8%3
5.1%1
3.4%3
31.1%1
+6.6%2
+0.02%5
34.9%3
0.7%1
0.6%3
*Republic of Adygea (Adygea)
1 facts of summary data falsification
3.5%1
8.5%3
3.0%1
7.8%3
1.8%1
0.9%3
32.3%1
18.2%3
0.9%1
1.8%3
54.0%1
61.0%3
2.7%1
0.5%3
*Murmansk region
1 facts of summary data falsification
22.1%1
19.7%3
15.9%1
18.1%3
0.2%1
1.2%3
26.5%1
21.8%3
4.9%1
4.8%3
27.5%1
+12.7%2
+0.06%5
32.0%3
1.0%1
0.6%3
*Voronezh Region
1 facts of summary data falsification
16.6%1
14.5%3
12.9%1
8.9%3
1.6%1
0.8%3
32.0%1
21.8%3
4.1%1
2.2%3
31.0%1
+2.4%2
+0.01%5
50.0%3
0.5%1
0.4%3
*Arkhangelsk Region
1 facts of summary data falsification
22.4%1
22.1%3
16.5%1
18.2%3
1.5%1
1.2%3
25.3%1
20.2%3
9.4%1
4.5%3
22.6%1
31.9%3
1.1%1
0.8%3
*The Astrakhan Region
1 facts of summary data falsification
12.6%1
14.6%3
3.4%1
8.3%3
0.3%1
0.7%3
8.9%1
13.3%3
2.9%1
1.0%3
67.4%1
+25.1%2
+0.08%5
60.2%3
0.0%1
0.3%3
*Bryansk region
1 facts of summary data falsification
13.6%1
11.2%3
17.3%1
10.6%3
1.2%1
0.9%3
33.0%1
23.3%3
3.3%1
2.0%3
29.2%1
+19.4%2
+0.07%5
50.1%3
1.1%1
0.4%3
*Kemerovo region
1 facts of summary data falsification
12.5%1
8.0%3
15.5%1
12.3%3
1.3%1
0.8%3
16.8%1
10.5%3
5.2%1
2.2%3
46.0%1
+4.7%2
+0.01%5
64.2%3
0.6%1
0.4%3
15.1%4
10.6%3
18.8%4
11.7%3
1.7%4
0.9%3
24.4%4
20.7%3
3.6%4
2.0%3
33.7%4
52.2%3
1.0%4
0.6%3
19.5%4
16.1%3
15.3%4
16.6%3
0.4%4
0.7%3
28.3%4
24.7%3
3.5%4
2.4%3
31.5%4
37.2%3
0.2%4
0.4%3
12.8%4
13.4%3
23.5%4
17.8%3
1.4%4
1.3%3
25.7%4
22.4%3
6.6%4
4.7%3
26.9%4
37.5%3
0.9%4
1.0%3
28.1%4
27.2%3
13.5%4
15.4%3
1.0%4
1.3%3
19.9%4
16.8%3
6.5%4
3.5%3
28.4%4
33.4%3
0.8%4
0.7%3
12.9%4
11.2%3
13.4%4
12.2%3
1.2%4
0.9%3
38.7%4
32.0%3
2.9%4
2.1%3
27.0%4
39.0%3
1.2%4
0.8%3
9.4%4
8.5%3
10.3%4
9.2%3
1.2%4
0.8%3
18.8%4
15.1%3
7.3%4
3.5%3
53.4%4
61.3%3
0.6%4
0.4%3
17.9%4
14.1%3
16.3%4
19.8%3
1.1%4
1.4%3
28.5%4
20.5%3
8.7%4
3.7%3
26.0%4
38.1%3
0.8%4
0.7%3
6.8%4
11.8%3
21.6%4
16.0%3
1.9%4
1.2%3
19.9%4
23.4%3
3.0%4
3.4%3
44.6%4
41.9%3
0.3%4
0.7%3
16.9%4
13.4%3
11.1%4
14.2%3
1.0%4
1.0%3
36.0%4
25.6%3
8.7%4
3.5%3
23.6%4
39.6%3
1.4%4
0.7%3
17.0%4
16.8%3
19.9%4
16.9%3
1.3%4
1.0%3
26.0%4
26.2%3
3.4%4
2.4%3
29.9%4
34.9%3
0.8%4
0.4%3
12.1%4
10.3%3
26.8%4
21.0%3
2.1%4
1.7%3
22.0%4
19.2%3
2.4%4
1.9%3
32.4%4
43.5%3
1.6%4
0.7%3
27.6%4
24.7%3
18.6%4
16.0%3
1.1%4
0.9%3
16.5%4
16.8%3
4.8%4
4.3%3
27.4%4
32.7%3
1.3%4
2.1%3
17.1%4
7.2%3
8.1%4
7.6%3
1.3%4
0.8%3
21.1%4
11.8%3
29.7%4
6.9%3
19.8%4
63.5%3
1.9%4
0.6%3
16.2%4
16.4%3
15.3%4
13.9%3
1.2%4
0.9%3
32.3%4
25.1%3
8.2%4
5.1%3
24.7%4
36.7%3
0.8%4
0.5%3
14.5%4
15.6%3
20.0%4
12.6%3
1.5%4
1.0%3
27.6%4
23.1%3
4.0%4
2.3%3
30.6%4
43.6%3
1.0%4
0.5%3
15.5%4
13.8%3
24.4%4
22.5%3
1.6%4
1.3%3
17.3%4
16.1%3
4.8%4
2.8%3
33.4%4
41.0%3
1.3%4
0.6%3
15.6%4
12.7%3
13.5%4
15.7%3
1.3%4
1.1%3
36.0%4
30.3%3
10.3%4
4.3%3
20.6%4
33.8%3
1.1%4
0.6%3
15.6%4
11.6%3
14.7%4
9.6%3
1.6%4
1.0%3
25.4%4
22.4%3
3.9%4
2.1%3
37.1%4
51.2%3
0.9%4
0.4%3
20.5%4
15.9%3
14.7%4
17.0%3
0.9%4
1.0%3
25.6%4
23.6%3
5.2%4
3.2%3
29.4%4
36.7%3
1.9%4
0.9%3
28.6%4
25.2%3
10.7%4
14.8%3
1.5%4
1.2%3
22.5%4
17.3%3
8.1%4
5.0%3
26.7%4
33.5%3
0.5%4
0.6%3
18.5%4
18.6%3
19.2%4
14.8%3
1.0%4
1.1%3
24.1%4
24.2%3
6.2%4
2.9%3
27.6%4
36.2%3
0.1%4
0.5%3
8.7%4
11.2%3
16.8%4
16.6%3
1.1%4
2.5%3
15.8%4
19.5%3
1.9%4
2.8%3
53.8%4
45.1%3
0.5%4
0.7%3
16.6%4
13.3%3
12.6%4
14.1%3
2.6%4
2.2%3
30.7%4
25.5%3
11.3%4
5.5%3
23.3%4
37.1%3
1.1%4
0.7%3
23.1%4
16.7%3
16.3%4
14.4%3
0.8%4
1.0%3
25.5%4
22.9%3
4.2%4
2.5%3
26.7%4
40.1%3
0.6%4
0.5%3
15.1%4
16.4%3
17.2%4
17.9%3
1.1%4
1.1%3
26.5%4
21.0%3
7.0%4
4.3%3
29.6%4
36.3%3
1.5%4
0.8%3
20.7%4
22.6%3
15.5%4
15.5%3
1.9%4
1.8%3
25.5%4
24.0%3
7.5%4
4.8%3
26.1%4
29.0%3
1.0%4
0.7%3
17.3%4
15.6%3
15.3%4
14.4%3
2.1%4
1.4%3
25.8%4
21.9%3
4.0%4
4.1%3
33.4%4
40.4%3
0.4%4
0.6%3
22.0%4
20.6%3
19.5%4
17.9%3
1.4%4
0.9%3
18.9%4
19.3%3
11.8%4
6.2%3
23.5%4
32.3%3
1.7%4
0.9%3
19.3%4
21.5%3
17.7%4
12.9%3
0.5%4
1.1%3
25.5%4
20.5%3
1.6%4
3.5%3
27.3%4
38.3%3
0.5%4
0.6%3
22.8%4
18.2%3
22.3%4
18.7%3
0.8%4
0.9%3
22.7%4
23.3%3
5.2%4
3.1%3
23.5%4
33.0%3
0.3%4
0.5%3
23.6%4
19.8%3
8.9%4
11.7%3
1.6%4
1.2%3
30.2%4
23.2%3
11.5%4
3.8%3
22.3%4
38.4%3
1.4%4
0.5%3
10.1%3
18.6%3
2.2%3
17.1%3
4.1%3
45.3%3
0.6%3
10.3%3
10.6%3
0.8%3
21.5%3
1.5%3
53.3%3
0.5%3
18.8%3
10.7%3
1.3%3
20.9%3
1.6%3
43.4%3
0.4%3
14.1%3
19.2%3
1.1%3
18.6%3
1.7%3
43.3%3
0.5%3
1.3%3
1.5%3
0.1%3
4.5%3
0.3%3
91.6%3
0.1%3
19.8%3
16.7%3
1.2%3
22.7%3
2.7%3
34.9%3
0.6%3
21.8%3
8.5%3
0.8%3
16.4%3
1.7%3
49.2%3
0.5%3
0.2%3
0.0%3
0.1%3
7.9%3
0.0%3
91.4%3
0.1%3
12.6%3
9.5%3
0.8%3
24.3%3
1.9%3
49.0%3
0.4%3
6.0%3
2.2%3
0.4%3
21.7%3
0.3%3
67.9%3
0.3%3
14.5%3
16.9%3
0.8%3
19.6%3
2.0%3
44.4%3
0.5%3
14.4%3
13.5%3
1.4%3
20.7%3
2.3%3
45.7%3
0.5%3
10.5%3
15.7%3
0.9%3
19.8%3
1.9%3
48.1%3
0.5%3
15.0%3
17.5%3
1.3%3
24.8%3
2.8%3
36.0%3
1.1%3
2.3%3
0.4%3
0.3%3
2.9%3
0.8%3
91.0%3
1.5%3
0.2%3
0.1%3
0.0%3
17.6%3
0.1%3
81.9%3
0.0%3
5.4%3
11.2%3
0.9%3
6.7%3
1.7%3
70.3%3
0.7%3
4.7%3
13.6%3
0.7%3
6.6%3
1.2%3
71.7%3
0.4%3
7.2%3
4.0%3
0.6%3
18.4%3
1.4%3
66.1%3
0.7%3
15.1%3
15.1%3
1.2%3
23.6%3
3.1%3
39.8%3
0.7%3
0.5%3
0.3%3
0.1%3
8.8%3
0.1%3
89.8%3
0.1%3
6.0%3
7.1%3
0.5%3
16.5%3
1.4%3
66.7%3
0.3%3
11.6%3
17.4%3
1.6%3
22.8%3
3.5%3
41.0%3
0.8%3
0.2%3
0.0%3
0.1%3
0.1%3
0.0%3
99.5%3
0.0%3
1 Real summary from protocols obtained at the Election Locations
2 False summary provided by the Election Committee in locations, that had falsifications
3 Summary data provided by the Election Committee
4 Summary data from protocols, obtained by this moment, in regions that did not have falsifications
5 Amount of votes stolen compared to all votes for this party in this region, including the precincts, from which we don't have protocol data.
** If there is at least one falsification inside a micro-region, then it will most likely happen in the neighbouring election locations (Example Example Example) - that's why we count the number of locations that are neighbouring the ones with violations as the ones, that can contain violations.
* Regions, from which we have received final protocols, are marked with this sign.
Увидел сам - передай 5-м другим.
По почте, скайпу, в ЖЖ, ВКонтакте или Фейсбуке, неважно.
Только так информация сможет достичь достаточного количества людей к выборам 4 марта.
Last update: 01.17.2012 10:34
 
34.26%
Is the real rating of United Russia at this moment , согласно всем полученным протоколам.
+13.33%
Has been stolen from other parties by United Russia and the Election Committee according to the protocols.
29
Regions with falsifications.
 
About this projectUpload a protocol
Votes for United Russia in the whole country
 
100%
0%
 
Real data from official protocols obtained at Election Locations (A)
 
Data from Election Committee (B)
 
Votes rigged by the Election Committee in favor of United Russia (B minus A)
 
Votes for United Russia in 2007
Comparison of data from paper protocols VS data from the Election Committee *
 
17.25%
13.24%
A Just Russia
12.72%
11.67%
LDPR
1.29%
0.97%
Patriots
24.24%
19.19%
CPRF
7.56%
3.43%
Yabloko
34.26%
49.32%
United Russia
0.79%
0.60%
Right Cause
Все данные, представленные на сайте, можно использовать как угодно и где угодно. А если вы при этом еще поставите на нас ссылку, нам будет очень приятно :)
© Рука Госдепа США 2011, зарегистрировано в США, размещено в США.
А теперь, вместо того, чтобы рассуждать, кто сделал этот проект - лучше разберитесь, кто украл у нас голоса.
«Кто украдет достаточно для покупки веревки — на этой веревке и будет повешен» © Петр I